# All Science Fair Projects

## Science Fair Project Encyclopedia for Schools!

 Search    Browse    Forum  Coach    Links    Editor    Help    Tell-a-Friend    Encyclopedia    Dictionary

# Science Fair Project Encyclopedia

For information on any area of science that interests you,
enter a keyword (eg. scientific method, molecule, cloud, carbohydrate etc.).
Or else, you can start by choosing any of the categories below.

# Creation and annihilation operators

In physics, an annihilation operator is the operator in quantum field theory that lowers the number of particles in a given state by one.

Also, a creation operator is an operator that increases the number of particles in a given state by one, and it is the Hermitian conjugate of the annihilation operator.

In quantum chemistry the creation and annihilation operators more often refers specifically to the ladder operators for the quantum harmonic oscillator. The raising operator is interpreted as a creation operator, adding a quanta of energy to the oscillator system. Vice versa for the lowering operator. In more archiac terminology, the pair of operators and their action on quantum states is known as second quantization.

The mathematics behind the creation and the annihilation operators is identical as the formulae for ladder operators that appear in the quantum harmonic oscillator. For example, the commutator of the annihilation and the creation operator associated with the same state equals one; all other commutators vanish.

While the concept of creation and annihilation operators is well defined for free field theories, in interacting QFTs, they can only be defined in the interaction picture, which does not exist according to Haag's theorem.

 Contents

## Derivation of bosonic creation and annihilation operators

In the context of the quantum harmonic oscillator, we reinterpret the ladder operators as creation and annihilation operators, adding or subtracting fixed quanta of energy to the oscillator system. Creation/annihilation operators are different for bosons (integer spin) and fermions (half-integer spin). This is because their wavefunctions have different symmetry properties.

Suppose the wavefunctions are dependent on N properties. Then

For bosons: ψ(1,2,3,4,...N) = ψ(2,1,3,4,...N)
For fermions: ψ(1,2,3,4,...N) = -ψ(2,1,3,4,...N)

For now let's just consider the case of bosons because fermions are more complicated.

Start with the Schrödinger equation for the one dimentional time independent quantum harmonic oscillator

$\left(-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{d^2}{d x^2} + \frac{1}{2}m \omega^2 x^2\right) \psi(x) = E \psi(x)$

Make a coordinate substitution to nondimensionalize the differential equation

$q \equiv \sqrt{ \frac{\hbar}{m \omega}} x$.

and the Schrödinger equation for the oscillator becomes

$\frac{\hbar \omega}{2} \left(-\frac{d^2}{d q^2} + q^2 \right) \psi(q) = E \psi(q)$.

Notice that the quantity ħω = hν is the same energy as that found for light quanta and that the Hamiltonian hitting ψ on the left side of the equation above looks a lot like a difference of squares

$\left[ \frac{-d / dq + q}{\sqrt{2}}\right] \left[\frac{d / dq + q}{\sqrt{2}}\right] = \frac{1}{2} \left(-\frac{d^2}{dq^2} + q^2 \right) + \frac{1}{2} \left(q \frac{d}{dq} - \frac{d}{dq} q \right)$

The last term in that equation is the commutator of q with its derivative. So let's calculate that commutator [ q, ∂/∂q ]

$\left(q \frac{d}{dq}- \frac{d}{dq} q \right)f(q) = q \frac{df}{dq} - \frac{d}{dq}(q f(q)) = -f(q)$

In other words [ q, d/dq ] = - 1 or [ d/'dq, q ] = 1.

Therefore

$\frac{1}{2} \hbar \omega \left( -\frac{d^2}{dq^2} + q^2 \right) = \hbar \omega \left[ \frac{-d/ dq + q}{\sqrt{2}}\right] \left[\frac{d / dq + q}{\sqrt{2}}\right] + \frac{1}{2} \hbar \omega$

If we define

$a^\dagger \equiv \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left(-\frac{d}{dq} + q\right)$ as the "creation operator" or the "raising operator" and
$a \equiv \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left(-\frac{d}{dq} + q\right)$ as the "annihilation operator" or the "lowering operator"

the Hamiltonian becomes

$H = \hbar \omega \left( a^\dagger a + \frac{1}{2} \right)$.

This Hamiltonian is significantly simpler than the original form. Further simplifications of this equation enables one to derive all the properties listed above thus far.

Letting p = - i d/dq, where p is the nondimentionalized momentum operator

$a^\dagger = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(q - i p)$
$a = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(q + i p)$.

Substituting backwards, the laddering operators are recovered.

## Mathematical details

The operators derived above are actually a specific instance of a more generalized class of creation and annihilation operators. The more abstract (and hence more applicable) form of the operators satisfy the properties below.

Let H be the one-particle Hilbert space. To get the bosonic CCR algebra, look at the algebra generated by a(f) for any f in H. The operator a(f) is called an annihilation operator and the map a(.) is antilinear. Its adjoint is a(f) which is linear in H.

For a boson,

$[a(f),a(g)]=[a^\dagger(f),a^\dagger(g)]=0$
$[a(f),a^\dagger(g)]=\langle f|g \rangle$,

where we are using bra-ket notation.

For a fermion, the anticommutators are

{a(f),a(g)} = {a * (f),a * (g)} = 0
$\{a(f),a*(g)\}=\langle f|g \rangle$.

Physically speaking, a(f) removes (i.e. annihilates) a particle in the state |f> wheareas a(f) creates a particle in the state |f>.

The free field vacuum state is the state with no particles. In other words,

$a(f)|0\rangle=0$

where |0> is the vacuum state.

If |f> is normalized so that <f|f>=1, then a(f) a(f) gives the number of particles in the state |f>.

Note that the creation and annihilation operators are "generalized complex conjugates" of each other. Usually, the notation is chosen in such a way that the a(f) is the creation operator, and a(f) is the annihilation operator. The reminds us that something "extra" is being added to the system. The topic can be misleadingly confusing if this is not done.

## Notational caveats and considerations

In quantum mechanics, Dirac bra-ket notation is often used. However, there is some ambiguity in this notation, particularly when the need to differentiate between these things:

• The lowest energy state
• The zero state
• The vacuum state
• The zero ket

Often, these are all interchangably notated as |0>, or even | >. As a result, it is necessary to read carefully, and consider the context in which the notation is used.

For example, in the quantum harmonic oscillator, the ground state has the property that when the annihilation operator b is applied to it, it satisfies b|0> = 0| > = 0

The intermediate step is rarely indicated as it is considered necessary only when more conceptual/mathematical rigour is needed.

In this example, the lowest energy state is denoted as |0>. It is labeled as the "zero state", but it is important to emphasize that any state can be labeled as the "zero" state. The zero state is often used as a reference state to other quantum states. Therefore, the |0> state need not be the state with the absolutely the lowest energy. In the case of the harmonic oscillator, it is due to the particulars of the mathematics that the ground state is chosen to be |0>. The vacuum state is the state where no quanta is available to be extracted. This special null state is denoted by | >. This vacuum state is also known as the "zero ket" because there are zero particles in the state. Unfortunately, the lowest energy state |0> is also known as the "zero ket" for the different reason that the state is labeled as "zero". Care must be taken that the four concepts listed above are not mixed together.

### The vacuum state

The vacuum state is a conceptual state which has no particles. The state is usually denoted as |0>, not the "empty ket" | >. Interestingly enough, no actual function actually represents the |0> state, but for notational purposes, we define the vacuum state as being normalized such that <0|0> = 1 and that |0> is orthogonal to all other states of the form |N>, where N is any indexing of quantum states for a particular system.

### Energy spectra

In a quantum mechanical system, the range of discrete energies allowed in a system may be either finite, or infinite, or "semi-infinite".

In a system where the energies are confined to be semi-infinite [constant, ∞) such as the quantum harmonic oscillator, the vacuum state | >, (different from |0>) needs to be introduced in order to make the theory of creation and annihilation operators consistent. The lowest energy allowed in a semi-infinite energy system is known as the ground state. Since it is often used as the reference state, it is denoted by |0>. However, this state is not empty - the vacuum state | > is introduced to disambiguate these two states.

In a system where the range of energies is (-∞, ∞), the vacuum state is almost always denoted by |0>. There is no need for the "null" state | > as |0> already is sufficient to denote "emptiness". There is also no "ground state" present, which is why the notational ambiguity arises. This interpretation arises directly from the relativistic formalism of quantum mechanics by Dirac, which later became one of the foundations for quantum field theory. One of the shortcomings of quantum field theory however, is its allowance of energy states tending to infinity. The attempt to resolve this problem is very much an active part of quantum mechanical research today.

In summary for infinite and semi infinite systems

         COMMON NOTATION FOR STATES
infinite         semi-infinite

ground state    none               |0>

vacuum state     |0>               | >


There is no | > state needed for infinite-ranged-energy-systems in quantum mechanics.

03-10-2013 05:06:04