Science Fair Project Encyclopedia
Fixed point (mathematics)
This article is not about fixed-point arithmetic.
- f(x) = x2 − 3x + 4,
then 2 is a fixed point of f, because f(2) = 2.
Not all functions have fixed points: for example, the function f(x) = x + 1 has no fixed point on the reals, since x is never equal to x + 1 for any real number. In graphical terms, a fixed point means the point (x, f(x)) is on the line y = x, or in other words the graph of f has a point in common with that line. The example is a case where the graph and the line are a pair of parallel lines.
Attractive fixed points
An attractive fixed point of a function f is a fixed point x0 of f such that for any value of x in the domain that is close enough to x0, the iterated function sequence
converges to x0. How close is "close enough" is sometimes a subtle question.
The natural cosine function ("natural" means in radians, not degrees or other units) has exactly one fixed point, which is attractive. In this case "close enough" is not a stringent criterion at all - to demonstrate this, start with any real number and repeatedly press the cos key on a calculator. It quickly converges to about 0.73908513 (provided, of course, it is set to find cosines in radians), the fixed point. That is where the graph of the cosine function intersects the line y = x, and this is no coincidence.
Not all fixed points are attractive: for example, x = 0 is a fixed point of the function f(x) = x2 + x, but iteration of this function for any value other than zero rapidly diverges.
Attractive fixed points are a special case of a wider mathematical concept of attractors.
Theorems guaranteeing fixed points
There are numerous theorems in different parts of mathematics that guarantee that functions, under certain circumstances, must have one or more fixed points. These are amongst the most basic qualitative results available: such fixed-point theorems that apply in generality are very valuable insights.
Logician Saul Kripke makes use of fixed points in his influential theory of truth. He shows how one can generate a partially defined truth predicate (one which remains undefined for problematic sentences like "This sentence is not true"), by recursively defining "truth" starting from the segment of a language which contains no occurrences of the word, and continuing until the process ceases to yield any newly well-defined sentences. (This will take a denumerable infinity of steps.) That is, for a language L, let L-prime be the language generated by adding to L, for each sentences S in L, the sentence "S is true." A fixed point is reached when L-prime is L; at this point sentences like "This sentence is not true" remain undefined, so, according to Kripke, the theory is suitable for a natural language which contains its own truth predicate.
The contents of this article is licensed from www.wikipedia.org under the GNU Free Documentation License. Click here to see the transparent copy and copyright details