Science Fair Projects Ideas - Grand Slam Cup

All Science Fair Projects

      

Science Fair Project Encyclopedia for Schools!

  Search    Browse    Forum  Coach    Links    Editor    Help    Tell-a-Friend    Encyclopedia    Dictionary     

Science Fair Project Encyclopedia

For information on any area of science that interests you,
enter a keyword (eg. scientific method, molecule, cloud, carbohydrate etc.).
Or else, you can start by choosing any of the categories below.

Grand Slam Cup

The Grand Slam Cup was a tennis tournament. It was an ITF event (like the Grand Slam events themselves) held every year in Munich, Germany.

The tournament was created in 1990 and was played between late September and mid-October, on an indoor carpet court. Throughout its existence, it became famous for paying the highest prize money in the game, of USD$1.5 million. According to the rules, however, if the tournament was won by a player who had also won one of the Grand Slam events of that same year, the winner would receive a bonus of USD$1 million. So, although the original amount of 1.5 million US dollars was already the biggest prize in the game, as many as 4 players (a quarter of the participants, if each Grand Slam event had had a different winner in the year) had a chance of pocketing USD$2.5 million.

The Grand Slam Cup was not recognized by the ATP, however, and thus participation in it did not count any points for the Rankings and it was not considered an official career title.

After the 1999 edition, on December 9 1999, a compromise was reached between the ITF and the ATP by which the Grand Slam Cup was merged with the ATP World Championship (the year end tournament), which was also held every year in Germany (but in Hannover), giving birth to the Tennis Masters Cup, which would be an itinerary event. Technically this was the end of the competition, since the general view is that the Tennis Masters Cup is a continuation of the World Championship, not the Grand Slam Cup.

The direct result of this compromise can be seen in the qualification rules for the present Tennis Masters Cup, which do not exactly repeat those of the ATP World Championship. The World Championship was meant to include the 8 best ranked players in a calendar year, which theoretically could exclude a Grand Slam champion that might not have been able to keep his rank up for the remainder of the year. Although the present rules also refer to the best 8 of the year, it guarantees access to all Grand Slam champions of the year (they had a guaranteed spot in the Grand Slam Cup). Usually, those champions are also among the best 8, but if one or more are not, they will be included to the detriment of the 8th best player (if it's two champions that need to be included, then the 7th best would also be excluded, and so on – to the limit of the 5th player, since there are only 4 Grand Slam events).

This situation could be observed in the 2004 Tennis Masters Cup (in Houston, USA), where the 8th best player of the year, Andre Agassi, of the United States, was excluded of the event in favor of Gaston Gaudio, of Argentina, who had won that year's Roland Garros but was ranked 10th at the end of the year.

Contents

Qualification and form of play

Qualification and seeding for the event had nothing to do with the ATP ranking. The ITF would attribute to players a given numbers of points for their performance in the Grand Slam events (these points were only meant for qualification for the Grand Slam Cup, nothing more). After all four events were over, the ITF would sum up the numbers and the 16 highest results would qualify for the Grand Slam Cup.

The system of play was a simple playoff, except that the first two of the four rounds were best-of-three matches, while the last two (semifinals and final) were best-of-five, and there was no tie break in the final set (third, if best-of-three, fifth if best-of-five).

ITF's Grand Slam Cup points table
Rounds of Grand Slam events only

Round
Points
1st Round 2
2nd Round 20
3rd Round 40
Round of 16 75
Quarter finalist 150
Semi finalist 300
Finalist 450
Winner 600


Champions

Year
Champion
Runner-up
Score
1990 Pete Sampras (USA) Brad Gilbert (USA) 6-3 6-4 6-2
1991 David Wheaton (USA) Michael Chang (USA) 7-5 6-2 6-4
1992 Michael Stich (Germany) Michael Chang (USA) 6-2 6-3 6-2
1993 Petr Korda (Czech Republic) Michael Stich (Germany) 2-6 6-4 7-6 2-6 11-9
1994 Magnus Larsson (Sweden) Pete Sampras (USA) 7-6 4-6 7-6 6-4
1995 Goran Ivanisevic (Croatia) Todd Martin (USA) 7-6 6-3 6-4
1996 Boris Becker (Germany) Goran Ivanisevic (Croatia) 6-3 6-4 6-4
1997 Pete Sampras (USA) Patrick Rafter (Australia) 6-2 6-4 7-5
1998 Marcelo Rios (Chile) Andre Agassi (USA) 6-4 2-6 7-6 5-7 6-3
1999 Greg Rusedski (UK) Tommy Haas (Germany) 6-3 6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(5)


Complete Results

1990

(1124 December)
Round Match Score
R16
8 David Wheaton (USA) def. Yannick Noah (France) 7-6 6-7 6-3
4 Pete Sampras (USA) def. Andrei Cherkasov (Russia) 5-7 6-2 7-5
2 Ivan Lendl (USA) def. Christian Bergstrom (Sweden) 6-4 6-0
Henri Leconte (France) def. 7 Thomas Muster (Austria) 6-3 6-4
Aaron Krickstein (USA) def. 3 Andres Gomez (Ecuador) 6-3 6-4
5 Goran Ivanisevic (Croatia) def. Kevin Curren (USA) 7-6 7-6
Brad Gilbert (USA) def. 6 Jonas Svensson (Sweden) 2-6 6-3 6-4
Michael Chang (USA) def. 1 Stefan Edberg (Sweden) 6-4 4-6 7-5
QF
8 David Wheaton (USA) def. 2 Ivan Lendl (USA) 6-2 7-6
4 Pete Sampras (USA) def. 5 Goran Ivanisevic (Croatia) 7-6 6-7 8-6
Brad Gilbert (USA) def. Aaron Krickstein (USA) 6-7 6-4 6-3
Michael Chang (USA) def. Henri Leconte (France) 7-6 6-3
SF
4 Pete Sampras (USA) def. Michael Chang (USA) 6-3 6-4 6-4
Brad Gilbert (USA) def. 8 David Wheaton (USA) 6-3 3-6 7-6 2-6 6-4
Final
4 Pete Sampras (USA) def. Brad Gilbert (USA) 6-3 6-4 6-2


1991

(1023 December)
Round Match Score
R16
Todd Woodbridge (Australia) def. Aaron Krickstein (USA) 6-3 6-3
7 David Wheaton (USA) def. Paul Haarhuis (Netherlands) 1-6 6-3 6-2
3 Michael Stich (Germany) def. Goran Prpic (Croatia) 6-4 6-3
8 Patrick McEnroe (USA) def. Thierry Champion (France) 4-6 6-1 6-4
4 Ivan Lendl (USA) def. Cristiano Caratti (Italy) 6-4 6-1
Jakob Hlasek (Switzerland) def. 6 Jimmy Connors (USA) 0-6 6-4 6-4
5 Guy Forget (France) def. Jaime Yzaga (Peru) 6-3 6-3
Michael Chang (USA) def. 2 Jim Courier (USA) 6-4 6-2
QF
7 David Wheaton (USA) def. Todd Woodbridge (Australia) 6-4 7-6
3 Michael Stich (Germany) def. 5 Guy Forget (France) 7-6 6-4
4 Ivan Lendl (USA) def. Jakob Hlasek (Switzerland) 7-6 6-3
Michael Chang (USA) def. 8 Patrick McEnroe (USA) 6-2 6-4
SF
7 David Wheaton (USA) def. 3 Michael Stich (Germany) 7-6 7-6 7-6
Michael Chang (USA) def. 4 Ivan Lendl (USA) 2-6 4-6 6-4 7-6 9-7
Final
7 David Wheaton (USA) def. Michael Chang (USA) 7-5 6-2 6-4
03-10-2013 05:06:04
The contents of this article is licensed from www.wikipedia.org under the GNU Free Documentation License. Click here to see the transparent copy and copyright details
Science kits, science lessons, science toys, maths toys, hobby kits, science games and books - these are some of many products that can help give your kid an edge in their science fair projects, and develop a tremendous interest in the study of science. When shopping for a science kit or other supplies, make sure that you carefully review the features and quality of the products. Compare prices by going to several online stores. Read product reviews online or refer to magazines.

Start by looking for your science kit review or science toy review. Compare prices but remember, Price $ is not everything. Quality does matter.
Science Fair Coach
What do science fair judges look out for?
ScienceHound
Science Fair Projects for students of all ages
All Science Fair Projects.com Site
All Science Fair Projects Homepage
Search | Browse | Links | From-our-Editor | Books | Help | Contact | Privacy | Disclaimer | Copyright Notice