Science Fair Projects Ideas - Hyatt Regency walkway collapse

All Science Fair Projects

      

Science Fair Project Encyclopedia for Schools!

  Search    Browse    Forum  Coach    Links    Editor    Help    Tell-a-Friend    Encyclopedia    Dictionary     

Science Fair Project Encyclopedia

For information on any area of science that interests you,
enter a keyword (eg. scientific method, molecule, cloud, carbohydrate etc.).
Or else, you can start by choosing any of the categories below.

Hyatt Regency walkway collapse

(Redirected from Hyatt Hotel disaster)

The Hyatt Regency hotel walkway collapse happened on July 17, 1981 during a tea dance at the Hyatt Regency Hotel in Kansas City, Missouri.

The 40-story-tall Hyatt Regency hotel was constructed in 1978 and opened in July 1980 after some construction delays.

Its lobby had a multistory atrium that was crossed on the second, third and fourth levels by three suspended concrete walkways. On July 17, 1981 approximately 2,000 people had gathered in the atrium to participate in and watch a dance contest , including hundreds packed onto the walkways. At 7:05 pm the second and fourth floor walkways both collapsed, killing 114 people and injuring more than 200. The incident became a classic model for the study of engineering ethics and errors.

Only four days after the disaster, Wayne Lischka, a structural engineer hired by the Kansas City Star newspaper, discovered the cause - an unauthorized change in the design of the walkways.

The walkways were suspended from a set of tie rods, with the second floor walkway hanging directly underneath the fourth floor walkway. The original designs by Gillum-Colaco International called for a single set of rods running from the second floor all the way to the ceiling, with the fourth floor walkway supported partway along them by a set of nuts. The rods were manufactured by the Havens Steel Company . Havens Steel disapproved of the Gillum-Colaco design since it was in fact impossible to build as drawn, as it would have required the whole of the rod below the fourth floor to be threaded in order to screw on the nuts to hold the fourth floor walkway in place. These threads would almost certainly have been damaged beyond use when the structure for the fourth floor was hoisted into position. Instead, they went with an alternate plan in which two separate sets of tie rods would be used; one connecting the fourth floor walkway to the ceiling, and the other connecting the second floor walkway to the fourth floor walkway.

In the original design the nuts on the fourth floor walkway only had to support the weight of the fourth floor walkway itself, and were sized according to that requirement. In the revised design, however, the fourth floor nuts were required to support both the fourth floor walkway and the second floor walkway hanging from it. This change in requirements was not noticed, and so the same nuts as in the original design were used - now holding up twice the weight they should have been. When the walkways became heavily loaded, the nuts and washers on the fourth floor walkway pulled through the walkway's support beams and both walkways collapsed.

Investigators concluded that the basic failure that led to this flaw was a lack of proper communication between Gillum-Colaco and Havens Steel. In particular, the drawings prepared by Gillum-Colaco were only preliminary sketches but were interpreted by Havens as finalized drawings. Gillum-Colaco failed to review the final design which would have allowed them to catch the error in increasing the load on the connections. It also turned out that the original design for the hanger rod didn't satisfy the Kansas City building code either, though it still would have withstood the demands placed on it much better than the revised design.

Gillum-Colaco was cleared of criminal negligence, but the Missouri Board of Architects, Professional Engineers, and Land Surveyors convicted the engineers employed by Gillum-Colaco who had signed off on the final drawings of gross negligence, misconduct, and unprofessional conduct in the practice of engineering. They lost their engineering licenses in the states of Missouri and Texas and their membership to ASCE. Gillum-Colaco lost its licence as an engineering firm. At least $140 million was awarded to victims and their families in both judgments and settlements in subsequent civil lawsuits; a large amount of this money came from Crown Center Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Hallmark Corporation which was the owner of the actual hotel franchise (like most hoteliers, Hyatt runs on the franchisor/franchisee system).

Life and health insurance companies probably absorbed even larger uncompensated losses in payouts to their covered insureds.

Further Reading

To Engineer is Human: The Role of Failure in Structural Design by Henry Petroski

External links

10-26-2009 08:16:03
The contents of this article is licensed from www.wikipedia.org under the GNU Free Documentation License. Click here to see the transparent copy and copyright details
Science kits, science lessons, science toys, maths toys, hobby kits, science games and books - these are some of many products that can help give your kid an edge in their science fair projects, and develop a tremendous interest in the study of science. When shopping for a science kit or other supplies, make sure that you carefully review the features and quality of the products. Compare prices by going to several online stores. Read product reviews online or refer to magazines.

Start by looking for your science kit review or science toy review. Compare prices but remember, Price $ is not everything. Quality does matter.
Science Fair Coach
What do science fair judges look out for?
ScienceHound
Science Fair Projects for students of all ages
All Science Fair Projects.com Site
All Science Fair Projects Homepage
Search | Browse | Links | From-our-Editor | Books | Help | Contact | Privacy | Disclaimer | Copyright Notice