Science Fair Project Encyclopedia
- This article is about metamerism as it relates to color theory. For other meanings see the disambiguation page.
Metamerism is a psychophysical phenomenon commonly defined incompletely as "two samples which match when illuminated by a particular light source and then do not match when illuminated by a different light source."
In actuality there are several types of Metamerism, of which the first two listed below are most commonly referred to and also most commonly confused:
- Sample metamerism
- Illuminant metamerism
- Observer metamerism
- Geometric metamerism
Example: most people experience sample metamerism when putting on a pair of socks that appeared to be black in the bedroom (which may have incandescent lights), but later finding that one is black and the other is blue upon stepping into the kitchen (which may have fluorescent lights). The differences in the spectral power distributions between the incandescent and fluorescent lights each interact with the differences in the spectral reflectance curves of the socks to make them appear the same in one light source and different in another.
When two color samples appear to match under a particular light source, and then do not match under a different light source, this is an example of "sample metamerism." One can conclude that the spectral reflectance distributions of the 2 samples differ, and their plotted reflectance curves cross in at least 2 regions.
The two socks are called a "metameric match."
Illuminant metamerism is witnessed when you have a number of spectrally matched (exactly the same) samples, but when each is independently, yet simultaneously illuminated and viewed under lights whose spectral power distributions differ. You can perceive significant variations of the color.This phenomenon is rarely witnessed, unless you have a light box that allows you to see both lights separated by a divider, and your 2 identical samples illuminated by the different light sources. The lights are metameric matches. the sample does not matter in this case.
Example: When you visit a lighting department of a major home improvement store they will have a bank of lights with dividers in between. Grab a number of identical sample swatches from the paint chip department and place one identical sample under each light. Stand back to witness how each illuminant affects the sample.
Every individual perceives color slightly differently. (Assuming the individuals possess adequate color matching aptitude.) This can be demonstrated in many ways, but suffice it to say, observer metamerism is the reason there were 17 individuals tested to derive the 1931 "standard observer" values adopted by the CIE  and are still used as the basis for the majority of color science study today.
Identical colors appear different when viewed at different angles, distances, light positions, etc. It can be argued that one reason men and women often perceive color differently is that the distance between woman's eyes is, on average, slightly less than a man's, and that slightly different angle of stereoscopic viewpoint also falls under the category of geometric metamerism.
Graphic arts and color reproduction considerations
In the printing industry, metamerism is often considered to be a source of great frustration.
Explanation: Artists paint with oils, pastels, crayons, and various dyes and pigments, and each medium has unique spectral reflectance curves. The majority of color reproductions utilize combinations of cyan, magenta, yellow, and black inks or colorants. No combination of these inks can generate spectral matches to the colorants originally used to produce the original art. Therefore, a printed reproduction of an original artwork is only a metameric match to the original and accurate viewing is thus dependent upon the spectral characteristics of the illumination used.
Without the phenomenon of metamerism, mass art reproductions in color would not be possible and the color printing industry, as we know it, could not exist.
The contents of this article is licensed from www.wikipedia.org under the GNU Free Documentation License. Click here to see the transparent copy and copyright details