Science Fair Projects Ideas - U.S. presidential election, 2004, exit polls

All Science Fair Projects

      

Science Fair Project Encyclopedia for Schools!

  Search    Browse    Forum  Coach    Links    Editor    Help    Tell-a-Friend    Encyclopedia    Dictionary     

Science Fair Project Encyclopedia

For information on any area of science that interests you,
enter a keyword (eg. scientific method, molecule, cloud, carbohydrate etc.).
Or else, you can start by choosing any of the categories below.

U.S. presidential election, 2004, exit polls

The exit polls were conducted by Edison Media Research and Mitofsky International for the National Election Pool. The NEP has a policy of re-adjusting the final polls to match the vote as reported by state and local governments. Due to this policy later polls may be tainted so as to hide election fraud. Women do seem to be either more likely to participate in a poll, or more likely to vote early. In the early polls women represented 58% of the sampled voters, but by poll closing only represented 52% of the voters as reported by local governments, so women were likely oversampled in the early polling. The 52% figure is consistent with historical turnout numbers. Blacks may also have been undersampled, since black turnout increased 25%, much greater than the increase in turnout by other groups.

Unfortunately, NEP has not made the raw numbers and sampling methods available to other pollsters to study. Historically, exit polls are very accurate at predicting the winner. This is because the largest source of error in conventional polls is in determining the probability that a voter will show up in a polling place and vote. Exit polls do not have to cope with this variable. However the probability that the difference between the polls and the vote as reported by state and local governments in Florida, Ohio, and Pensylvania is due to random error is 1 in 250,000,000. This has led Republicans and Democrats alike to cry foul. Karl Rove has implicated a vast left wing conspiracy to tilt the exit polls, while Democrats have cast doubt on the accuracy of the un-auditable Diebold and Election Systems & Software, Inc. DRE software written by Bob Urosevich.


Contents

Late Exit Polls

Last CNN exit polls

State Bush (%)Kerry (%) Sample SizePredicted
Differential
Florida 49.8% 49.7% 2846 Bush 0.1%
Colorado 49.9% 48.1% 2515 Bush 1.8%
Iowa 48.4% 49.7% 2502 Kerry 1.3%
Michigan 46.5% 51.5% 2452 Kerry 5.0%
Wisconsin 48.8% 49.2% 2223 Kerry 0.4%
Minnesota 44.5% 51.5% 2178 Kerry 9.0%
Nevada 47.9% 49.2% 2116 Kerry 1.3%
Ohio 47.9% 52.1% 1963 Kerry 4.2%
New Mexico 47.5% 50.1% 1951 Kerry 2.6%
Pennsylvania 45.4% 54.1% 1930 Kerry 8.7%
New Hampshire 44.1% 54.9% 1849 Kerry 10.8%

CNN Ohio exit poll by gender

Sex Bush (%) Kerry (%) Sample Size
Males 49% 51% 876 +/- 11
Females 47% 53% 987 +/- 11

The sample size is not known exactly because it was reported as percentage with only two significant digits, and a total sample size of 1863.

Final exit poll as reported by TruthIsAll on www.democraticunderground.com

Final 4pm Polls
State  Kerry%  Bush%  Diff%  Kerry EV
AL41.059.0(18.0)
AK40.559.5(19.0)
AZ47.053.0(6.0)
AR46.653.4(6.8)
CA54.046.08.0 55
CO49.150.9(1.8)
CT58.541.517.0 7
DE91.09.082.0 3
DC58.541.517.0 3
FL50.049.01.0 27
GA43.057.0(14.0)
HI53.346.76.6 4
ID33.566.5(33.0)
IL57.043.014.0 21
IN41.059.0(18.0)
IA50.749.41.3 7
KS35.065.0(30.0)
KY41.059.0(18.0)
LA44.555.5(11.0)
ME54.845.39.5 4
MD57.043.014.0 10
MA66.034.032.0 12
MI52.547.55.0 17
MN54.545.59.0 10
MS43.356.8(13.5)
MO47.5 52.5 (5.0)
MT39.8 60.3 (20.5)
NE36.8 63.3 (26.5)
NV49.4 50.7 (1.3)
NH55.4 44.6 10.8 4
NJ55.0 45.0 10.0 15
NM51.3 48.7 2.6 5
NY63.0 37.0 26.0 31
NC48.0 52.0 (4.0)
ND34.0 66.0 (32.0)
OH52.1 47.9 4.2 20
OK35.0 65.0 (30.0)
OR51.2 48.8 2.4 7
PA54.4 45.7 8.7 21
RI64.0 36.0 28.0 4
SC46.0 54.0 (8.0)
SD37.8 62.3 (24.5)
TN41.5 58.5 (17.0)
TX37.0 63.0 (26.0)
UT30.5 69.5 (39.0)
VT65.0 35.0 30.0 3
VA47.0 51.0 (4.0)
WA55.0 45.1 9.9 11
WV45.3 54.8 (9.5)
WI52.5 47.5 5.0 10
WY29.0 65.0 (36.0)
50.6049.34311

Late Exit Polls reported on Microsoft's Slate.com

State   Kerry%  Bush%  Nader%
Florida 51 49
Ohio 51 49
Michigan 52 46 1
Pennsylvania 53 46
Iowa 50 49
Wisconsin 51 48 1
Minnesota 52 46 2
New Hampshire 54 44 1
New Mexico 50 48 1
Colorado 49 50 1
Arkansas 45 54 1
Missouri 47 52
New York 62 36 2
Nevada 49 48 1
New Jersey 54 44 1
West Virginia 45 54 1

Early Exit Polls

Early Exit Polls reported on Microsoft's Slate.com

State   Kerry%  Bush%
Florida 50 49
Ohio 50 49
Pennsylvania 54 45
Wisconsin 51 46
Michigan 51 47
Minnesota 58 40
Nevada 48 50
New Mexico 50 48
North Carolina 49 51
Colorado 46 53

External links

See also

Last updated: 05-29-2005 14:05:44
10-26-2009 08:16:03
The contents of this article is licensed from www.wikipedia.org under the GNU Free Documentation License. Click here to see the transparent copy and copyright details
Science kits, science lessons, science toys, maths toys, hobby kits, science games and books - these are some of many products that can help give your kid an edge in their science fair projects, and develop a tremendous interest in the study of science. When shopping for a science kit or other supplies, make sure that you carefully review the features and quality of the products. Compare prices by going to several online stores. Read product reviews online or refer to magazines.

Start by looking for your science kit review or science toy review. Compare prices but remember, Price $ is not everything. Quality does matter.
Science Fair Coach
What do science fair judges look out for?
ScienceHound
Science Fair Projects for students of all ages
All Science Fair Projects.com Site
All Science Fair Projects Homepage
Search | Browse | Links | From-our-Editor | Books | Help | Contact | Privacy | Disclaimer | Copyright Notice