For comments/questions regarding my AMA advocacy cases please see that respective page:

Netoholic Advocacy Instantnood Advocacy

Laura Bush Advocate

Things seem to have calmed down for now, but you never know. I'll keep you in mind if things start up again. Thanks. googuse 08:14, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)

ACORN

By the way, kudos to you for taking on the ACORN article. I was still in the middle of my once-over, but I'll leave it to you for the moment. Your edits are a lot bolder, anyway. - Nat Krause 08:10, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Thank you for your contribs to the ACORN article. LegCircus 16:14, Sep 7, 2004 (UTC)

I thought you did a good job condensing the 1975-1980 section. For responses to your controversies section see Talk:ACORN. LegCircus 00:22, Sep 8, 2004 (UTC)

Yeah I put in a couple of edits on ACORN last month, but I'm way too distracted to keep it up. VeryVerily 00:08, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)

NPOV

Welcome to the vast "right wing conspiracy" VV. Want some similar fun, come check out ACORN. Wgfinley

LegCircus 16:45, Oct 14, 2004 (UTC)

good work ...

on replacing the Ike picture. It WAS a travesty for it to be absent for so long. Sfahey 02:06, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Please read the opening para of my User page. Adam 01:32, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Sorry about that Adam, didn't see that on your User page. Will handle it from here. --Wgfinley 05:22, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Good work, my friend

I, blankfaze, hereby award you this Barnstar, for your great work securing permission from the AP to use Image:TrangBang.jpg.

I just wanted to thank you for your great work securing permission from the Associated Press to use Image:TrangBang.jpg.

The image is a phenomenal one which adds a LOT to a good number of articles. The project is certainly improved by being able to use it. Thanks again for your work. [[User:Blankfaze|]] 23:25, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Thanks very much! My very first Barnstar! I really appreciate it and will put it on my page! --Wgfinley 17:10, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Welcome fellow advocate

I'm an active advocate-- though something of a silent partner. I just wanted to acknowledge your post on the AMA talk page by welcoming you to AMA. Please let me know if there is anything that you need, and I'll see what I can do or refer you to someone who can do it better. :) -JCarriker 23:19, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)

RE Ap photos: "I am a strong believer" I dont know wether to read that AP notice as a permission slip, (like they would say no) or a warning notice for all and any AP photos held under fair use. -SV|t|th 03:13, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Neutrality on Chinese sovereignty issues

Hi, thanks for noticing me. How can I help! -- Uncle Ed (talk) 18:27, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)

(see Wikipedia:Chinese naming controversy)

Eisenhower Article

I didn't mean to revert. It was one of the best known state funerals. The best known was that of JFK. user talk:SNIyer12

Thank You

Thank you for your message user talk: SNIyer12

Thanks

Thanks for your help up until this point. I did try to find you on IRC, especially last night when I id finally meet up with Kim Bruning. Sorry you feel I didn't respond quickly enough, because I really wasn't ignoring you, it was justa matter of timing I guess. -- Netoholic @ 22:48, 2005 Apr 17 (UTC)

I haven't gotten any email from you, which may explain the miscommunication. If you are free, we can meet up on IRC. -- Netoholic @ 22:56, 2005 Apr 17 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks for your support on my RfA. So how much did I owe you again? ;-) In any case, I shall attempt to put the shiny new buttons to good use. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 02:57, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Your message

I got your message, though I was a little confused by you saying I was experimenting on the site. I wasn't; I removed the picture because my browser was showing a picture of a mule instead of a picture of Benedict XVI. Perhaps, it might have been an old version of the page my computer cached. I apologize for doing that. I should have paid more attention. I would not have done so unless it was to remove some inappropriate image. dcgb7f

Image tagging

Your arbitrary addition of tags to images will be reported. —Cantus…☎ 03:44, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)

It's not arbitrary, if you are claiming fair use you need to give a reason, you have not and have called the tags "idiotic" feel free to report it. --Wgfinley 03:45, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Image:Cardinal_Joseph_Ratzinger_1965.jpg is from a Chilean site. Read this tag:

Why do you keep vandalizing this page? —Cantus…☎ 03:53, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)

Whatever. I'm going to bed. I probably won't be back till next week. —Cantus…☎ 03:55, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)

And it clearly states fragments of a work, you've taken the entire photo. That is probably the only photo you have any argument on, the others are blatant infringements on news agency images. --Wgfinley 03:58, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I have removed all images from the article, as they are all most likely copyvios. Vatican pics are very much copyrighted. See your yourself at http://www.vatican.va/news_services/or/photo/ph_index_eng.html —Cantus…☎ 04:02, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)

So now the community decides what's fair use and what's not? I don't think so. Vatican.va says their images are copyrighted. End of story. We can't use them. —Cantus…☎ 04:13, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)

You claim this image: Image:Popebenedictxvi firsttimeonthrone.jpg to be from the Vatican, yet there is no information on its source. It could well be from a news agency. I have removed the vatican tag, please don't keep adding it until you have a source. —Cantus…☎ 04:24, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)

On the images I uploaded you added copyvio tags, but on that other image from another user you didn't add any copyvio tags, you just contacted the user. —Cantus…☎ 04:29, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for Coolness

Thanks for your calm head in all of that. Certian users were very hard to deal with. In any event, please take a look at this: [1]. It appears the copyvio tag was simply removed. Is this a good image? It looks likes it from associated press and could be a copyright problem. Thanks for your help. -Husnock 05:08, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Im at last done for the evening. When I saw what was going on at Benedict XVI, I swore I would not get involved with that article. Guess I got sucked in anyway. The last Pope came about when I was 3 years old, this is the first one Ive got to see coming in as an adult. Pretty interesting. Thanks again for teh cool head. I'm gone. -Husnock 07:15, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)